Page 342 - ESSAYBCTO ENG 1ST
P. 342

You lawyers did not believe me when I told them that it was not true, so

                mething I had never even dreamed of, and on the contrary, they said I h

                ad no remorse, so they sentenced me even though I claimed not guilty in
                the first trial . What criminal record do I have ?

                What if I have a criminal record ? There is nothing .

                But here again, it was covered up again as a habit . Just because one inci
                dent was duplicated, the worst case scenario is to say it is a habit. It is u

                nderstandable that such incidents become a habit in an organization multi

                ple times, but how can it become a habit when only one company has do

                ne it ? Just because there are a lot of people in one company, they habit
                ually cover it up.

                I don't even understand, how can something like this happen ,,, It's not a

                different incident, it's one incident that happened over and over again. B
                ecause of many people, this is a habit ?

                does this mean, a habitual fraud under the Economic Aggravated Punish

                ment Act ? Why on earth should I overwrite something like this ? And y

                ou're saying that's because it's a failed business ?
                I don't understand this . I just can't understand it . Your honor !

                Then he said that you should still talk ,,, so I said, “ Okay then . ” “ L

                et me tell you .” I explained everything in detail, as far as I knew, until
                the end, and the judge listened . But I didn't expect ... .




                However, when I went to the day of sentencing, the judge overturned th
                e original decision and declared me not guilty . Before receiving any inv

                estment, this person made sure to tell me what he did wrong and all the

                damage he could suffer .
                Therefore, it seems that the first trial overlooked this point . This perso

                n is in charge of the seller and may make exaggerated advertisements, a

                nd since he was notified of all these damages in advance, this person ha

                s no intention of defrauding, and there is no promise to pay the principal
                or interest in the future .
     QR
                Therefore, he declared himself not guilty and declared not guilty in rega

                rd to similar charges .
                                                     342
                But ,,,,, but many people talk about your unfairness and petition you and

                say that this is too unfair , About 100 people asked for this person to be
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347